March 2, 2024

This paper discusses how social networking causes society to become more polarized in politics. It may be contended that social networking doesn’t have any effect on the perspective of political and social beliefs, but there are many types of the way it has impacted society and history. The results aren’t well-known to a lot of citizens on which exactly social networking does to society. Youthful individuals are easily affected by social media’s manipulative tactics. It is vital to deal with the results of social networking since it could eventually alter the future. A simple condition in social networking is the fact that lots of people only see one for reds of the story, which influences their political opinions. If lots of people become more and more divided within their beliefs and opinions from one another, it may cause violence and stop the advancement and development of society. These studies project will pull from many databases and resources to best examine how social networking is impacting the polarization from the public. The study implies that social networking causes society to become more politically and socially diverse.

Abstract

Society has become more polarized due to social media’s numerous platforms and manipulative business models, that have political and social impacts. It’s revealed that social networking could be manipulative and also have very real effects on individuals. Studies have proven there are and will also be more problems in society because of social networking, including more violence between political groups and individuals with various backgrounds and lifestyles. Polarization may be the growing division between two attitudes or beliefs to ideological extremes, also it causes many changes to happen in society throughout everyday existence.

The study was collected online articles, databases, documentaries, and books that prove social networking causes polarization in society.

With all the numerous platforms, there’s plenty of false and biased information to often be spread. These platforms are manipulative and cause polarization that has many political and social impacts on society.

To conclude, social networking has numerous methods for being polarizing to society. It’s proven that social networking comes with a significant effect on many people’s resides in society.

Liam Barrett

Mr. Dickson

British II

28 March 2021

Is Society Increasingly Polarized Due to Social Networking?

Democrat or Republican. White-colored or Black. Us or Them. Polarization may be the growing division between two attitudes or beliefs to ideological extremes that triggers many changes to happen in society throughout everyday existence. When social networking was initially produced, many citizens didn’t realize the potential and numerous real results of polarization in society. Society has become more polarized due to social media’s numerous platforms and manipulative business models, that have political and social impacts.

The various social networking platforms available provide more polarized opinions than in the past and target age ranges differently. During the 1960s, there have been only three channels which were broadcasted on tv: NBC, CBS, and ABC (Ganzel 2007). These television stations had minimal biases. Now, there’s Tiktok, Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook, together with countless cable systems and r / c which have all sorts of knowledge. The numerous platforms cause individuals to become more polarized because more details could be false, manipulated, or biased. Author Hong expresses that “Daily, citizens share information printed via government Twitter accounts, and also the content might be fragmented or customized. In addition, the popularity for information to become shared in this manner might not be easily reversed” (Hong 2016). These platforms also target age ranges differently. Facebook is usually utilized by older citizens, TikTok is generally utilized by teenagers and more youthful kids, Instagram and Twitter are social networking apps which are generally used by lots of different day of people (but nonetheless mainly attract the youth). Author Hong explains that “Twitter has become a vital platform which anybody having a smartphone can participate in political discourse” (Hong 2016). Similar age ranges participate in political debates over social networking, which separates multiplication of ideas between generations. This spread of falsehoods causes variations in viewpoints between individuals who’re constantly given information in one biased source and individuals who’re given information from the different biased source. Twitter can publish something about politics and also have it’s spread instantly to citizens all around the globe with information lots of people will remember. Overall, the numerous social networking platforms on offer are : adding towards the polarization from the public.

The company types of these platforms are polarizing their users simply because they concentrate on selling ads, reinforcing viewpoints by showing people what they need to determine, and fostering addiction. Platforms sell advertisements to companies for any profit. Instagram’s website attracts companies by telling firms that “each ad is tailored towards the actions users required on [the business’s] site” and they can “promote specific products a person viewed or will probably buy” and “up-sell existing clients with related offerings” (AdRoll 2021). Social networking apps track exactly what a viewer does with an application after which transmits ads which are thought to be associated with exactly what the viewer likes. An easy advertisement shows people what they need to determine (they’re uncovered to simply what they’re already thinking about). Similarly, social networking can produce a person possess a certain belief about something they can reinforce by never exposing them to another side or by portraying the other side within an excessively negative, harsh light. Reinforcement of viewpoints is yet another highly common business design of social networking apps. Algorithms would be the means by that your point of view is reinforced to some citizen with an application and there are various ones. Certain algorithms send and suggest information to some viewer that relates to that which was checked out formerly and it is information which the viewer really wants to see. On TikTok, there’s something known as a “for you page,” that has endless videos that are based on videos the viewer has formerly viewed. James Cooper discusses how “TikTok concentrates on the performance of every individual video instead of [taking] into consideration all of your profile. The woking platform compares the quantity of rewatches, shares, comments and likes each video gains” (Cooper 2021). Viewpoints on social networking that individuals disagree with are hardly ever proven to opposing sides, resulting in social networking “bubbles.” “Polarization within the U.S. might be driven by contact with views people disagree with, instead of being separated from their store by filter bubbles” (Lee De-Wit, Sander Van Der Linden, Cameron Brick 2019). This can lead to a rise in polarization. Another documentary states, “We’ve produced a global by which online connection is becoming primary. Specifically for more youthful generations. But, for the reason that world, anytime a couple connect, the only method it’s financed is thru a sneaky third person who’s having to pay to control individuals a couple. So we’ve produced a whole global generation of people that were elevated inside a context using the very concept of communication, the concept of culture, is manipulation.” (Lainer 2020). Social networking apps are created to be addictive and manipulative, which is because algorithms made to keep people happy within their comfort zones, adding to polarization. The company plan of those apps also fosters addiction. One good reason people get hooked on social networking is it creates a feeling of well-being. If a person posts something and will get many likes and supporters, it may cause a sense of excitement, which will not have happened without using social networking. “When we switch the human-level communities we thrive in-for example religion, social responsibility, education, and volunteerism-with communities online that provide us an incorrect feeling of power, we’re heading lower the road of failure” (Zito 2019). Social networking supplies a false feeling of power and righteousness because individuals are manipulated into developing extreme opinions with the problematic business types of social networking platforms and therefore are rewarded through the addictive nature of those apps to have their opinions.

The results of polarization vary from political riots to social beliefs that concentrate on an “Us versus. Them” attitude. Among the greatest results of polarization is viewed in politics. The content “Are Social Networking Driving Political Polarization?” states “Since 1994, the amount of Americans who begin to see the opposing political party as a menace to ‘the nation’s well-being’ has bending.” (Lee De-Wit, Sander Van Der Linden, Cameron Brick 2019). More citizens are generally Democrats or Republicans rather of moderates, which is because social networking feeding negative beliefs toward the opposing political group. There’s even evidence that implies that the newest election has affected people’s viewpoints due to social networking. Violence in the capitol building is caused by social networking encouraging political violence by distributing rumors about rigged election counts and secret terrorist organizations. There’s also numerous levels of social polarization in today’s world. Social networking has produced tension regarding the subject of racism in modern society. “Cancel culture” pits the general public against just one individual and enables individuals to easily be belittled. At these times, many people apologize for his or her actions and join the canceling majority, but others, instead of acknowledging to creating an error, only strengthen their previous beliefs to warrant their actions. Lots of people think that African Americans continue to be not completely comparable to white-colored Americans, which is responsible for plenty of anger in society. “Big Walter accustomed to say, he’d get right wet within the eyes sometimes, lean his mind back using the water waiting in his eyes and say, ‘Seem like God did not think fit to own black man only dreams – but he did provide us with children to ensure they are dreams appear worth while” (Hansberry 29). Many Black citizens in modern society continue to be degraded and individuals on social networking are quarrelling about this, that has caused plenty of violence and riots from individuals who support this concept and individuals who don’t. “I accustomed to support BLM, however I discover their whereabouts as violent domestic terrorists uninterested in addressing the actual problems inside the Black community. BLM is all about a communist revolution not about enhancing the Black community…” (Perrin 2020). This really is one particualr individual who had his beliefs manipulated by social networking. His opinion on Black Lives Matter altered due to misinformation that’s been spread about the objective of the movement. It proves that social networking is responsible for many citizens to argue issues about racism and think negatively toward somebody who has another take on something. Together with these topics, there’s a rise in polarization around the subject of sexism and sexual preference. Many of these are simply types of the way the public has become more polarized.

Social networking is adding towards the polarization from the public. There are lots of effects, just like an rise in those who have extreme views, be responsible for violence between opposing groups. People on social networking and social networking platforms have greatly led to a rise in polarization in society. Many citizens don’t realize how social media’s manipulative business models are earning people more separated from one another. There has been many effects and much more continuously happen if social networking keeps reinforcing polarization in society.

Works reported

AdRoll. “Facebook and Instagram Ads with AdRoll.” AdRoll, 2021, world wide web.adroll.com/sem/facebook-instagram-ads?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=intl-facebookbudget-signup&utm_term=instagram-ad&utm_content=instagram ad&ar_clx=yes&ar_funnel=google_ads&ar_campaign=10167352534&ar_adgroup=101817626877&ar_ad=506815353270&ar_strategy=search&gclid=Cj0KCQjw0oCDBhCPARIsAII3C_FScYs0bLRyK1fAI8cwrfbSFDTf6kyFg2cyCzkliImv9P0WuBmNgV4aAuxMEALw_wcB.

Cooper, James. “TikTok Marketing Companies (2020).” Business of Apps, 10 Marly. 2021,

world wide web.businessofapps.com/marketplace/tiktok/.

Fitzgerald, F. Scott. Great Gatsby. New directions, 2021

Ganzel, Bill. Television, Wessets, 2007, livinghistoryfarm.org/farminginthe50s/existence_17.html.

Hong, Sounman. Political Polarization on Twitter: Social Networking May Lead to Online

Extremism, OpenScholar, 2016, scholar.harvard.edu/sounman_hong/political-polarization-twitter-social-media-may-lead-online-extremism.

Instagram for Business, Instagram, 1 May 2019, business.instagram.com/.

Lee de-Wit, Sander Van Der, et al. “Is Social Networking Driving Political Polarization?” Greater Good,

Greater Good Magazine, 16 Jan. 2019, greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/is_social_media_driving_political_polarization.

Orlowski, Shaun. “The Social Dilemma.” Netflix Official Site, 9 Sept. 2020,

world wide web.netflix.com/title/81254224.

Perrin, Andrew. “23% Of Users in U.S. Say Social Networking Brought These to Change Thoughts about an

Issue Some Cite Black Lives Matter.” Pew Research Center, Pew Research Center, 16 March. 2020,

Zito, Salena. “Social Networking Doesn’t Reflect the actual America.” Gale Opposing Viewpoints

Online Collection, Gale, 2021. Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints, link.gale.com/apps/doc/EGEVZE488199519/OVIC?u=cast18629&sid=OVIC&xid=f3dd7713. Utilized 18 February. 2021. Initially printed as “The challenges of buying and selling social

Annotated Bibliography

Hong, Sounman. Political Polarization on Twitter: Social Networking May Lead to Online

Extremism, OpenScholar, 2016, scholar.harvard.edu/sounman_hong/political-polarization-twitter-social-media-may-lead-online-extremism.

A great source compiled by a professor from Harvard who discusses social networking and how it’s creating polarization in society. It states that social networking creates systems of individuals concentrating on the same viewpoints which could influence a lot of things including politics. It also claims that the current presidential elections happen to be manipulated due to social networking. Political leaders and supporters of these can certainly and rapidly spread details about them or occasions associated with them also it causes numerous impacts and polarization.

Lee de-Wit, Sander Van Der, et al. “Is Social Networking Driving Political Polarization?” Greater Good,

Greater Good Magazine, 16 Jan. 2019, greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/is_social_media_driving_political_polarization.

This can be a reliable resource that talks a great deal about how exactly social networking is adding to polarization within the U . s . States. It particularly states how in politics the percent of democrats and republicans has elevated greatly instead of groups among them. Additionally, it claims that social networking only shows one for reds for an event that is and can result in polarization. Many democrats and republicans have ideas the opposing political party is a menace to the country’s well-being. This source provides extensive good and straight answers I’m able to use within my research paper.

Orlowski, Shaun. “The Social Dilemma.” Netflix Official Site, 9 Sept. 2020,

world wide web.netflix.com/title/81254224.

The social dilemma is really a Netflix documentary that completely discusses the results and also the risks of social networking in society. It discusses how social networking was created and it is effects can be quite polarizing. It discusses how social networking easily manipulates an individual it keeps showing information which the individual viewing it wants to determine what can reinforce opinions. This can be a reliable source to make use of with a lot of information to exhibit people how social networking is extremely impacting society and which makes it more polarized.

Zito, Salena. “Social Networking Doesn’t Reflect the actual America.” Gale Opposing Viewpoints

Online Collection, Gale, 2021. Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints, link.gale.com/apps/doc/EGEVZE488199519/OVIC?u=cast18629&sid=OVIC&xid=f3dd7713. Utilized 18 February. 2021. Initially printed as “The challenges of buying and selling social interaction for social networking,” Washington Examiner, 18 August. 2019.

This database is about how social networking doesn’t reflect the actual media due to its information. It states that social networking is built to bring people together but actually, it’s doing the alternative. It states that social networking can frequently punish individuals with unpopular ideas since the apps create standards is the perfect person. I additionally learned and browse online that social networking results in a false feeling of power. On social networking people receive likes and comments which could frequently produce a false feeling of fame which in tangible existence people don’t receive. This database article offered me a large amount of reliable information will be able to use to exhibit how social networking is making society more politically diverse.